Author
| Message |
|---|
|
|
And this tournament is also continuing ... a hard fight in the one outstanding game for the current round, methinks!
Having worked hard on Kingdom Battle I (albeit spasmodically) I suspect that it is easier to give an 'improved' version of the scores when everything is complete!
Wishing you all good chess, and a good life!
Gens Una Sumus,
Clive 
|
|
|
Another tough game for Gambit seems to be holding us up!
http://www.queenalice.com//game.php?id=598014
Interesting game! Which Gambit eventually won!
|
|
|
Round 5 has now begun (and finished in 2 cases). I'm trying to compile a more user-friendly scoreboard than the one the QA software supplies; using 0/0.5/1 scoring rather than 0/1/2.
Amadeus: 0/2
Boilermaker1234: 2/4
CampbellMarcel: 0/4
Carlos75: 2/4
ClivetheBeard: 3/5
CowboyNoel 1/3
Deep: 2/4
EddieK: 1.5/5
Gambitshark: 4/4
Gbsalvio: 3.5/4
Gil: 2/4
JimMorrisson: 3/4
Modestyblase: 2.5/4
Mustangmike: 0/2
Razoman: 2/4
RichardB: 3.5/5
Ronyjarod: 3.5/4
Somebodysbigbrother: 1.5/5
Sunking 2/4
Twinigo 0/1
And the rather lop-sided scores are of course due to the Swiss tournament rule that people who lose on time are excluded from future rounds!
|
|
|
Thanks Clive!
I find this much easier to understand!
Best wishes,
Eddie
|
|
|
AND THE FINAL SCORES WERE:
Amadeus: 0/2
Boilermaker1234: 3/5
CampbellMarcel: 0/5
Carlos75: 2/5
ClivetheBeard: 3/5
CowboyNoel 1/3
Deep: 2/5
EddieK: 1.5/5
Gambitshark: 4.5/5
Gbsalvio: 4/5
Gil: 3/5
JimMorrisson: 3/5
Modestyblase: 3.5/5
Mustangmike: 0/2
Razoman: 2/5
RichardB: 3.5/5
Ronyjarod: 4.5/5
Somebodysbigbrother: 1.5/5
Sunking 3/5
Twinigo 0/1
This meant there was a tie between GambitShark and Ronyjarod, which the QA software splits in favour of Gambit because of his higher rating. But in fact as far as I am concerned they are just the joint-winners, so "well done guys"!
C
|
| Previous 1 2 |
