|
|
|
Topic: Integrating "chess assistance" into a CC game
| |
|
|
Author
| Message |
|---|
|
|
I believe that chess base is allowed but fritz iz not. chess base is a conveient way to use many chess boards simultaneously. I make a series of moves, if I want to look at another possibility all I need do is click, far easier than setting up the original position using a tangible set.
Chess base also allows one to compare an opening position to millions of games and see the statistics for various moves. It is also easy to replay a game between 2 grandmasters played decades ago to get a feel for the right way to play a position. I assert that chesss base is ok providing one does not use the kibitz mode.
There are data bases for end games.These data bases contain optimal play for all endings with 5 or fewer pieces on the board. For example 2 kings 2 rooks and 1 pawn. Theoretically the data base could be printed on paper. I believe these are also legal. However I thinking opening data bases are used far more the endgame data bases.
One thing I like about QA is no money is at stake. I assume that few of my opponents are using in engine. It seems like a lot of work and not very much fun. Imagine going to a club and assking someone to make moves for fritz becuase you want to have the feel of real chess pieces and a real opponent. I think you would have to pay someone to provide that service.
|
|
|
When I found out that QA allowed the use of opening books I started (mis)using them. I still step out of openings pretty early, and I've gone on 6 month binges with openings like b4/f4 etc.
|
|
|
I think all that analysis is best applied after a game really. 
|
|
|
Raeth
If all analysis is applied after the game then all the moves are random 
But you ment all computer analysis
|
|
|
Not neccessarily. Some people play intuitively, some people play the opening by memory etc.
|
| Previous 1 2 3 Next |
|
|
|
