|
|
|
Topic: Rating Queenalice X Rating FIDE
| |
|
|
Author
| Message |
|---|
|
|
Qual a relação aproximada entre o rating daqui com o rating FIDE normal? Alguém tem alguma idéia?
|
|
|
Rating QueenAlice - 200 ~ Rating FIDE.
F.
|
|
|
That's optimistic 
|
|
|
Very optimistic....
|
|
|
Ah, but there was a fairly long thread about this question already and that was more or less the conclusion of it. (axedre started said thread somewhere last year)
For those of us who truly, honestly don't use some software to assist them, it more or less holds. That would put me at an Elo of 1588, intermediate but not learning from mistakes, weak club player level. Guess I've been bad to deserve that...
F.
|
|
|
You know, there's something else that ought to be taken into consideration that doesn't seem to pop in anyone's mind.
People can "approach" that whole correspondence chess thingy differently. What I've seen over and over again are people who use it as a sort of "stocking server" for blitz games. What I mean by that is that some people have plenty of games at once, and play pretty much "instantly", without taking too much time to ponder their moves, as if they were playing a blitz game or something. And then there's another type of player who will simply play their moves when they're at a point where they must make a move.
Some (extreme) thing I've seen very very recently (actually, we're Sunday right?... I think it was on last Monday) is this: somebody played their move when they had less than 6 minutes left (yup, that's right).
Someone like that did either of two things: they thought for a long time and finally made their decision, or they simply said, "oh well now I gotta play". Evidently, it was a mere pawn push. Not a bad one, but a pawn push is easy to make when you either don't have time to play or don't know what to play.
These people, as it turns out, probably think less about their moves than they'd do in OTB games.
Then there are people like me who usually (okay, I blitz my moves sometimes, but you know... ain't nobody perfect) take a lot of time for their moves (by a lot I mean maybe what... 15 minutes?).
You'd expect the former types to have a smaller difference (not in absolute value, e.g. -200 < +100) between their QA rating and FIDE rating than the latter type (because they'd perform relatively better than the former on QA).
In the end, it is pretty obvious in my mind that, at best, you'd need two formulas (i.e. more than one single formula) to "translate" one rating into the other; you'd need to take into account what type of correspondence player the player really is (in probability theory, we'd be talking about conditional expectations, if you will).
|
| 1 2 3 Next |
|
|
|
